Amazon weight loss product reviews 'positively misleading' customers, say researchers

'We should be cautious about using reviews like these when deciding about health choices'

Aatif Sulleyman
Friday 10 February 2017 06:45 EST
Comments
Customers aren't deliberately trying to misinform others, but those who had a positive experience were more likely to share their results than those who had a poor experience
Customers aren't deliberately trying to misinform others, but those who had a positive experience were more likely to share their results than those who had a poor experience (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Customers should approach online reviews of health products with caution, say University of Aberdeen researchers.

An analysis of clinical trial data and user-generated online reviews has shown that customers are prone to exaggerating the effects of weight loss and cholesterol treatments, especially when they have positive results.

The researchers examined more than 1,600 Amazon.com reviews, and found that Benecol reviewers described an average drop in cholesterol over three times above what was found in carefully controlled trials.

Similarly, reviewers of Orlistat, a weight loss pill, claimed to have lost around twice as much weight as participants that took part in clinical trials.

“These treatments are not entirely ineffective,” said the University of Aberdeen’s Dr Micheal de Barra. “However, what we show is that the reputation as described in these reviews is much more positive than the clinical trial data show.”

He stressed that customers weren’t deliberately trying to misinform others.

Rather, users who had a positive experience were more likely to share their results than those who had an average or poor experience, skewing the reviews positively.

“Only some people who try a treatment will then go on to tell other people about their experience. However this subset of people are usually only those who have good outcomes," he added.

“The problem is that people with average or poor outcomes don’t tend to share their experiences. This means you get a positively skewed view of the treatment.

“We should be cautious about using reviews like these when deciding about health choices. These narratives have a powerful influence on our own future health behaviour because they provide simple and clear anecdotes, but this study shows that they can be very misleading.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in