Amazon admits employees listen to Alexa conversations

Amusing Alexa conversations were reportedly shared internally among Amazon workers

Anthony Cuthbertson
Thursday 11 April 2019 11:19 EDT
Comments
An Alexa-enabled Echo Dot pictured at Amazon Headquarters in Seattle, Washington, on 20 September, 2018
An Alexa-enabled Echo Dot pictured at Amazon Headquarters in Seattle, Washington, on 20 September, 2018 (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Amazon has admitted that employees listen to customer voice recordings from Echo and other Alexa-enabled smart speakers.

The online retail giant said its staff “reviewed” a sample of Alexa voice assistant conversations in order to improve speech recognition.

“This information helps us train our speech recognition and natural language understanding systems, so Alexa can better understand your requests, and ensure the service works well for everyone,” Amazon said in a statement.

“We have strict technical and operational safeguards, and have a zero tolerance policy for the abuse of our system. Employees do not have direct access to information that can identify the person or account as part of this workflow.”

Amazon does not explicitly state in its terms and conditions that humans review customer recordings, though its Alexa privacy settings offer users the chance to opt out of helping the firm “develop new features”.

Cyber security specialist Jake Moore said this suggests users could prevent their recordings from being shared with Amazon employees.

“Long has there been fears that smart technology and social media is listening to more than we may realise,” he told The Independent.

“Amazon’s Alexa privacy settings sadly don’t let you opt out of the voice recording, but you can stop your recordings being used for product development, plus you can delete any previous voice recordings in the settings.”

First reported by Bloomberg, Amazon employees had access to the customer’s first name, account number and the serial number of the smart device for each voice clip.

Staff are played a clip and then isolate any words that the Alexa AI has been unable to pick up. The humans can correct the transcription, with those results then being fed back into the machine so that it can more accurately listen to users in the future.

Some employees admitted to sharing amusing recordings with other employees via an internal chat room. Others said they had heard potentially disturbing conversations between people in their homes.

“We take the security and privacy of our customers’ personal information seriously,” an Amazon spokesperson told the news site.

“We only annotate an extremely small sample of Alexa voice recordings in order to improve the customer experience.”

Smart speakers made by other technology firms, such as Apple’s HomePod, also send voice data to be reviewed, though there appears to be a greater focus on privacy.

Apple’s security policy states that recordings are assigned a random ID number, meaning employees are unable to identify the customer.

Amazon has previously been ordered to hand over Alexa data as part of murder investigations in the US, most recently for a suspected double homicide in New Hampshire.

The firm has provided voice recordings to assist investigations but has stated that it “objects to overboard or otherwise inappropriate demands as a matter of course”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in