After the CIA joins Twitter, other organisations may be considering how best to use the little bird

John Rentoul on the other unlikely organisations that are, or appear to be, in the Twitterverse

John Rentoul
Saturday 07 June 2014 18:33 EDT
Comments
The CIA crest at it's headquarters
The CIA crest at it's headquarters (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When the CIA launched its Twitter account on Friday, the entire Twitterverse was shocked. You mean there are still big organisations that are not on Twitter? Most people are not on Twitter, but it is increasingly rare to find any organisation that cares about its image that does not use social media as part of its public relations.

The US Central Intelligence Agency has always been less secretive than the British intelligence agencies, the existence of which was officially acknowledged only in the 1980s. And its first tweet even made fun of the conventions of secrecy: "We can neither confirm nor deny that this is our first tweet." Just in case anyone thought this might lead to an opening of the post-Snowden and post-WikiLeaks floodgates, though, the second tweet was more reserved: "We look forward to sharing great unclassified content with you."

All the people who replied to the CIA's inaugural tweet by asking if it could remind them of their internet banking password should really have sent their messages to the US National Security Agency, however. It was the NSA that was implicated in mass monitoring of electronic metadata by Edward Snowden, and it has been on Twitter since December – although its account is curiously not listed by Twitter as "verified", unlike the CIA's.

Here we present a list of other unlikely organisations that are, or appear to be, on Twitter.

@MI6.CO.UK

Turns out to be a James Bond fan site. Perhaps the real MI6, otherwise known as SIS, the Secret Intelligence Service, which deals with abroad, is on Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter?

@MI5

This not the genuine UK domestic intelligence agency, we think. It features a picture of Lee Miller in Hitler's bath and says: “If you are a person of interest we will be following you.”

@JehovahWithUs

Not sure if it has anything to do with official Jehovah's Witnesses, as it only notes each day how many people have followed and unfollowed them (two of each yesterday). No record of how many doors were closed in their faces.

@Queen_UK

Is helpfully labelled “satire/spoof”, and we are sometimes amused: “Text from Prince Charles: ‘The King of Spain is abdicating to let his son have a go. What a nice man.' Not replying. #abdication.”

@BritishMonarchy

Is genuine, though. Promising, “Updates, pictures and videos from Buckingham Palace about the work and activities of The Royal Family and the institution of Monarchy.” it has 667,000 followers.

@ThePines

Turns out not to be the care home in Hove, capitalising on its newfound fame, thanks to escapee resident Bernard Jordan who (at the time of going to press) didn't have the expected spoof account either.

@Bilderberg

This is not run by the people who run the annual conference of influential people, but by people devoted to idea that Bilderberg is a conspiracy of the powerful.

@EnidBlytonSoc

The Secret Seven are so secret that they don't have a Twitter account, but you can follow the Enid Blyton Society instead.

@rain

is not what we might hope, the weather having no social media editor. @wimbledon_rain has sadly stopped giving precipitation updates, despite being very in demand, if only for two weeks a year. You'll have to visit @WeatherCast_UK instead.

@UGLE_GrandLodge

“Official Twitter channel of the United Grand Lodge of England, which is the governing body of Freemasonry in England, Wales and the Channel Islands.” Hiding in plain sight.

@OpusDeiUK

The once-secret Roman Catholic society has 465 followers. The Spanish branch has 25,000, US branch 2,700.

@FSB

This account has been “suspended”, according to Twitter. So perhaps it is Russia's secret service and nothing to do with the Federation of Small Businesses.

@alqaeda

“Newcomers @CIA have a verified account, while we still don't. Does @twitter prefer sinister govt. spooks to honest terrorists? #favoritism” We think it's not the official account.

@uriminzok_engl

“An English translation of @uriminzok – the official North Korea Twitter feed.” Its 3,900 followers will be disappointed if they are expecting cat pictures.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in