Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

University world-ranking position is more important that quality of teaching when it comes to graduate employment, students tell survey

Postgrads and undergrads also tell survey different ranking charts 'cause confusion'

Aftab Ali
Monday 27 July 2015 06:32 EDT
Comments
(Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A university’s position in world rankings is more important than the quality of teaching it offers if graduates want to find work, say the majority of students.

QS World University Rankings (QS-WUR) – an annual publication of university rankings – carried-out a survey with 519 students – mainly postgraduates – from countries across Europe, including the UK.

62 per cent of those interviewed said it was important for an institution to be internationally known in order to improve their employment prospects post-graduation.

And, if students were to compile their own rankings, 33 per cent said they would put more emphasis on employability while 20 per cent said they would focus on the quality of teaching.

Eager to improve their own job prospects, one student from Paris, Rachida, said: “I would want to know names of the firms where graduates go on to work” while another from Milan, Jacubo added: “Universities often have banners of their most prominent professors; what they should have however is banners of their most prominent alumni.”

One US student told the survey: “The name is really the most important, because then you have it on your CV” while another, Italian PhD applicant Lorenzo, admitted: “Whilst I agree that program is key, if I got an offer from Harvard, I would go there no matter what.”

On the whole, though, the survey found very few students actually take time to consult the methodology behind university rankings – which can result in confusion.

Master’s applicant, Valerio, said: “The same university is fourth in one ranking and very different in another ranking. So I don’t know which one is the right one.”

However, time taken to interpret rankings detracts from their appeal as a time-saving device, with fellow Italian applicant, Francesco, adding: “It takes a lot of time to understand exactly what the rankings are telling you and how to manipulate these results. I will waste time.”

Here, the challenge for rankings providers is to increase transparency and make top-level results easy and quick to unpack, the final report recommends, adding: “For universities, this is further confirmation of the importance of employment outcomes for today’s students, with implications for both service provision and marketing messages.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in