Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Men can expect vast riches from a first, but women will see no benefit

 

Richard Garner
Thursday 30 May 2013 11:13 EDT
Comments
(shutterstock)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Men can expect a massive pay boost during the lifetime if they get a first class honours degree from university - but women won’t earn an extra penny.

These are the startling findings from new research from the Centre for Economic Performance, based at the London School of Economics, published today.

The figures, from a study of more than 2,600 graduates from the LSE between 2005 and 2010, show that - on average - a student with a first-class degree earns three per cent more than those with a 2:1.  However, a gender breakdown shows that this means six per cent extra (or £1,780 a year) extra for men and zilch for women.

Over the course of a lifetime, this would be worth around £71,000 more for men - if their salary increases at the same rate.

The authors of the research, Andy Feng and Georg Gratz, admit they are baffled by its findings. “The difference between monetary gains for men and women is a puzzle,” they say.

One theory they put forward is that men are more likely to ask for more money or be given a higher wage offer in the first place by employers. “We honestly don’t know,” they add.

The research goes on to show that there is an even bigger gap in earnings between those gaining a 2:1 and those getting a 2:2 degree - the difference is worth about seven per cent in higher wages or the equivalent of £2,040 a year. There is no discernible gender gap in pay here, though.

“We find sizeable and significant effects for upper second degrees and positive but smaller effects for first class degrees on wages - we find that a first class and upper second are worth around £1,000 and £2,040 per annum respectively,” says the report.

The authors point out that those getting the £1,780 annual bonus for a first can be benefiting simply because they get one extra mark than those with a 2:1. The criteria for a first-class degree pass from the LSE is five scores of 70 per cent or more in five of a student’s nine papers. Scoring 69 per cent in the fifth paper would not cut the mustard.

“Our study is probably the best evidence available that exam results matter but there’s a lot more work to be done in understanding what drives the gender split,” the authors conclude.

The say “a sizeable fraction” of employers use degree classifications as the main indicator when assessing whether to hire someone - 75 per cent insisted on an upper second as the minimum entry requirement in 2012 compared to just 52 per cent in 2004.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in