Interview: It's never too late to start

Kirsten Schlesinger, 48, is a trainee solicitor at DLA Piper

Thursday 25 October 2007 11:23 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

I didn't realise it would be the case at the time, but I seem to have ended up as a trailblazer for that newest of diversity categories: the oldie! Before the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 even came into force I had set off down the trail of changing career to become a lawyer, at the age of 44.

It all began in early 2003 when I was made redundant from my job as a publishing director. Getting straight back into the publishing saddle would have been the obvious response but the more I thought about my next job, the more I realised that the industry no longer presented me with any challenges. I had been in the book trade for 20 years and the thought of doing more of the same until I retired filled me with dread.

So, I decided to cast myself adrift and began the search for a realistic alternative. Law was a career I had considered as a teenager, and having to go through a formal process of retraining gave me hope that when I emerged after two years of studying I would have as good a chance as anyone of securing a job.

However, it turned out that the whole application process is geared towards people in their twenties. I couldn't even complete most of the online training-contract applications because there was rarely sufficient space to include my work experience, while the extracurricular activities I'd pursued at university hardly seemed relevant 25 years on. I was lucky that my personal circumstances allowed me to take two years out to study and manage several years of low earnings. I also believe that my bold move was made easier by having strong academic qualifications: at least this gave comfort to would-be employers. Set against that was the (understandable) prejudice that, as an ex-director of several companies, I would not take to paginating bundles very readily!

With top law firms getting thousands of applications every year for a handful of training contracts, it becomes all too easy to bin any which seem at all difficult. It is easy to get a place at law school (provided you have the requisite exams) but getting a training contract is different. So how did I manage it? Research was crucial, making sure I didn't waste time applying to firms that had no evidence of employing mature candidates. Preparation also played a part, so that I had answers to the inevitable questions about willingness to do photocopying. And finally, it was a case of believing in myself, and being able to analyse my strengths - both in terms of personal characteristics and work experience - and matching these to the requirements of being a lawyer.

A career change was a risk for me, but one that seems to have paid off. Being a lawyer is stimulating, rewarding and has given me the chance to grow old if not disgracefully, at least by winding up rather than winding down!

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in