Permanent jobs give way to 'serial employment'

Short-term contracts are on the rise. Companies like them, but employees resent the loss of their ability to plan

Wednesday 17 July 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Short-term contracts may be popular with employers, but they are going down badly with most employees. Job-seekers resent the growing imposition of fixed-term contracts that guarantee them work for only limited periods and so make it difficult to plan mortgages, pensions or even holidays, says a report from outplacement specialist Sanders & Sidney.

On the other hand, says the "On The Move" report published last week, 75 per cent of companies interviewed said they had started to offer fixed- term contracts, mostly for posts of less than a year. Twenty per cent of the jobs they offer are short-term, compared with just 3 per cent five years ago.

Moreover, more than three-quarters of employers say fixed-term contracts are here to stay whether employees like it or not and almost half believe they could become as prevalent as the traditional open-ended contract.

This echoes the findings of another survey published this week by the employment agency Reed Personnel Services. It says employers continue to rely more heavily on temporary staff than on permanent employees - with adverse consequences for the long-term health of the British economy.

The greatest concern among job-seekers was that accepted fixed-term contracts make it difficult to make big financial commitments, such as taking out life insurance or mortgages. As a result, even though "safe" professions such as accountancy are introducing temporary and short-term working, "many employees are failing to face up to the reality of short-term working, with 75 per cent seeing them as a stepping-stone to longer-term employment. Employers, on the other hand, tend not to see the contracts that way."

Job-seekers also argue that fixed-term contracts can adversely affect a company's culture, with 76 per cent saying they make team-building more difficult and 65 per cent agreeing with the proposition that it causes more uncertainty within the company.

However, some employees do see advantages to short-term working. They particularly value the increased freedom and the combination of long-term flexibility with short-term security. Nearly three-quarters said "serial employment" gave them the chance to experience a range of jobs.

Frances Cook, managing director of Sanders & Sidney, said: "Our research has shown a quite understandable resistance to change among employees. The fact is that fixed-term contracts will become a normal, unremarkable way of working, used alongside traditional open-ended contracts."

ROGER TRAPP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in