British athletes must have freedom of expression in Beijing, Amnesty International demand

Amnesty has written to the BOA urging it to avoid placing restrictions on athletes

Jamie Gardner
Thursday 27 January 2022 10:14 EST
Comments
Amnesty International has written to the British Olympic Association ahead of next month’s Winter Olympic Games in Beijing (Jae C. Hong/AP)
Amnesty International has written to the British Olympic Association ahead of next month’s Winter Olympic Games in Beijing (Jae C. Hong/AP) (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

British athletes’ rights to free expression must be upheld at the Beijing Olympic Games, Amnesty International has said.

The UK chief executive of the human rights organisation, Sacha Deshmukh, has written to his counterpart at the British Olympic Association, Andy Anson, urging the BOA to avoid placing restrictions on athletes.

Amnesty said campaign messages, such as the ‘Where is Peng Shuai?’ T-shirts and banners which were initially banned by organisers of the Australian Open tennis tournament, must be supported by the BOA.

The letter provided Anson with an update on the “intensifying” suppression of human rights in China, citing the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in the Xinjiang province, the crackdown on democratic protests in Hong Kong and continuing concerns over tennis star Peng Shuai’s freedom and well-being.

The International Olympic Committee said on Wednesday that its representatives had spoken to Peng last week and were planning to meet her in Beijing next week, but has faced criticism over its handling of her situation.

Deshmukh said: “The British Olympic Association mustn’t repeat the Australian Open’s disastrous T-shirt ban and should instead support Team GB athletes wanting to speak about human rights in China.

“From the industrial-scale detention and torture of Uyghur people in Xinjiang, to the jailing of protesters in Hong Kong – these Games are taking place in the shadow of China’s horrific human rights abuses.

If the British Olympic Association resorts to muzzling athletes it will be complicit in China’s sportswashing attempts and complicit in its massive programme of systematic human rights abuse.

Amnesty UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh

“If the British Olympic Association resorts to muzzling athletes it will be complicit in China’s sportswashing attempts and complicit in its massive programme of systematic human rights abuse.

“These Games should not become a rights-free zone – freedom of speech and the right to openly debate and discuss human rights should be an integral part of these Games.”

Anson spoke about athletes’ rights to express themselves earlier this month, prior to receiving the letter from Amnesty.

He said: “We definitely want our athletes to be respectful of the athletes they are standing on the podium with, (but) we are not going to stifle their freedom of expression.

“We’ve told the athletes all along that we’re very happy for them to express themselves but to be sensible and to ideally touch base with us if they feel that they’re doing anything at all controversial. We are not the ones who are going to stop our athletes expressing opinions.”

Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter places restrictions on political protests at Games venues and sites.

The rules were relaxed slightly ahead of the Tokyo Games to allow athletes to express their views on the field of play before competition, provided this was “not targeted, directly or indirectly, against people, countries (or) organisations”.

This allowed, for instance, the women’s football team to take the knee before matches. However, any protest deemed to be targeted at the Chinese government would still be prohibited in Olympic sites and venues.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in