That was the weekend that was: United splash out to join the eco- warriors

Jon Culley
Sunday 29 November 1998 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ANOTHER MATCH, another 55,000 spectators through the Old Trafford gates and another sackful of money to be emptied into Manchester United's already overflowing coffers. Regardless of the result of yesterday's visit of Leeds, United emerged as winners in financial terms, as they do after every home game.

Now, with thousands more potential customers metaphorically queuing for the chance of a glimpse inside, United want to expand their "theatre of dreams", happily aware that the pounds 30m they plan to spend on 12,400 extra seats will soon be recouped. And then they'll simply get richer still...

After the controversy over the proposed BSkyB takeover deal, United cannot wonder that they are perceived as blinkered money-grabbers without a care for anyone else's interests. However, this is not entirely a true picture.

Amid much less publicity, United last week agreed to spend pounds 1m on a "good neighbour grant" to finance the extra cost of street cleaning, parking enforcement and residents-only parking schemes near the stadium on match days. They are also launching a scheme to encourage fans to use public transport, with park-and-ride facilities.

Cynics point out that the cost is less than a tenth of the fee they paid for Dwight Yorke and could almost be financed out of petty cash. But it represents the largest contribution any club has made to the environmental costs of staging football - and you cannot knock them for that.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in