Wimbledon 2017: Novak Djokovic eases into second round as injured Martin Klizan sparks retirement row

Djokovic won the first set 6-3 before Klizan, who struggled through the warm-up and received a medial timeout on Centre Court, was forced to retire with a calf injury

Luke Brown
Wimbledon
Tuesday 04 July 2017 13:21 EDT
Comments
Djokovic walks off with Klizan after the Slovakian retired injured
Djokovic walks off with Klizan after the Slovakian retired injured (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

​Novak Djokovic’s opening match at Wimbledon against an injured Martin Klizan was so easy that, come the end of the day, he was considering returning to Centre Court for an exhibition hit with Roger Federer just to get some game time under his belt.

Klizan retired injured while 6-3 2-0 down to Djokovic and Federer was also given a free pass into the second round when his opponent, Alexandr Dolgopolov, called it quits having played just a game more.

“Yeah, it’s really odd that Roger's result and my result more or less was the same,” Djokovic smiled in his post-match press conference. “We had a little joke about it in the locker room, saying we should maybe play a practice set on the Centre Court, have the crowd stay. But they had another match.”

In truth, Djokovic had Klizan beaten before a ball had even been hit. The Slovakian grimaced his way through the warm-up and it quickly became apparent that he was unlikely to finish the match against Djokovic — let alone compete with the 12-time grand slam champion.

Klizan managed to win his first three service games but was broken by Djokovic in the eighth game of the match, and quickly fell to pieces. He received a medical timeout at the end of the first set and, after being broken again at the beginning of the second, decided he was unable to carry on.

The nature of both his and Dolgopolov’s rapid retirements sparked a fierce debate on whether it was fair for players who retired mid-match to collect the full share of their prize money.

Djokovic is through to the second round of Wimbledon
Djokovic is through to the second round of Wimbledon (Getty)

Both men will pocked £35k for their truncated appearances, with John McEnroe speculating that the pair only began playing so that they could claim their prize money.

“It’s no good for anyone if a player in a one-on-one sport can’t compete on an equal level,” he said while commentating for the BBC. “I don’t know who the first lucky loser was but he will have been looking out there and said I could have been playing on the Centre Court at Wimbledon.”

In 2017, the ATP adopted a rule whereby players can retire on-site before a first round match, without losing the prize money they would have earned by playing it. It was hoped that this would deter players from playing in first round matches while injured, purely to earn a cash windfall.

And Djokovic admitted that the four grand slam tournaments should consider adopting a similar rule, to prevent fans from going home disappointed in the future.

“Maybe it should be addressed,” he said. “I think the new rule that the ATP has reinforced allows players who deserve already, but at the other hand allow someone else to play if they can. I support that kind of rule.

“I'm sure that most of the players on the tour, if not all, feel that. Especially if you walk out on the Centre Court, there is a responsibility.

“I'm sure the players that retired did not want to as this tournament has a special place in players' careers. The aura of Wimbledon has probably always been the strongest of any other tournament.

“It doesn't happen often really. I'm sure they tried their best, but it is what it is.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in