Sisters in faulty double-act
French Open: Serena Williams prevails over Venus in a final which lives down to expectations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sisters do not get to play each other very often in Grand Slam finals, which is just as well to judge by the standards of the bizarre French Open women's occasion at Roland Garros. Yesterday it was the turn of Little Sis, Serena Williams, to defeat Big Sis, Venus, 7-5 6-3 in an hour and 31 minutes and collect the second Grand Slam of her young life, together with a cheque for £475,000.
The match, eagerly anticipated, produced 13 breaks of serve in 21 games, some brilliant shots and many more awful ones. Serena had 54 unforced errors, Venus 47. Serena hit five double-faults, Venus nine. A kindly thought would be to put down the dreadful occasion to nerves, but there was no disguising that much of this showpiece was unadulterated tripe, as Serena acknowledged. "I wasn't mentally focused and we were both making a lot of errors," she said. "My dad would have been very upset at the way we were playing."
The Parisian audience, never slow to castigate below-par performances, were remarkably restrained but from time to time whistles, catcalls, slow handclapping and booing erupted. At the end, when Venus called up to her relatives in the VIP seats for a camera to record her sister's big moment on the podium, the day descended into embarrassment. As the French Tennis Federation president Christian Bimes waited to present the trophy, the runner-up struggled to make her camera click. The winner's promise to thank the crowd in French lasted one sentence before dissolving into giggles.
The Williams girls are now numbers one and two in the world and will be seeded like that at Wimbledon, where Venus has won for the past two years. Just as their father, Richard, predicted when they were tiny, they now dominate the women's game, and rightly so. But had they produced this sort of tennis earlier in the tournament, neither would have made the second week.
They had met eight times before, Venus winning five including the final of the US Open last year. That, too, was a disappointing occasion. But other matches brought accusations that results had been pre-arranged on their father's instructions. Their first final, at Key Biscayne three years ago, looked cut and dried before a ball was hit as Venus won the first set, surrendered the second and took the third.
At least yesterday's final did not suffer that stigma. They were certainly trying, simply not succeeding. There was the odd thunderous groundstroke from Serena, a gazelle sprint or two from Venus. But the standard of serving was abysmal, with seven breaks in the first set and another half-dozen in the second. It started in the very first game, with Venus double-faulting twice to gift Serena a 1-0 lead. Not to be outdone, Serena threw in two double-faults to drop serve in the fourth game.
After half an hour, only the four games had been completed, and as they embarked on a game of six deuces (and one break point for Serena), derisory whistles floated down from the gallery. Venus held serve eventually, something she managed to do only three times all afternoon. She extended the lead to 4-2 as Serena, guilty of a poorly executed drop shot which was dispatched, bounced her racket in annoyance.
Perhaps that was the stimulus she needed, since she swept the next seven games. As Venus dropped serve to love with another double-fault, there were more whistles and slow handclapping. Undismayed, she lost serve again without winning a point, the obligatory double-fault included. The first set lasted 61 minutes, with Serena gaining a set point when Venus charged the net, only to strike the tape with her forehand volley. Then came a blazing Serena forehand winner and a raised, clenched fist. At least she won the set in style.
Any expectation that the second set would be an improvement was banished as Venus was broken in the first game, wafting a backhand wide. Serena extended the lead to 2-0 with two aces, the first (and only) ones of the match. More boos greeted another Venus service loss to love. She seemed to accept the inevitability of defeat without undue worry. She managed to narrow her sister's lead to 4-3 before Serena, accelerating and brightening with the finish line in sight, went 5-3 up with some powerful blows.
The final game summed up a deeply disappointing contest. Serving to stay alive, Venus netted a high backhand volley, watched a bludgeoning Serena forehand rocket past her, struck a backhand yards over the baseline to go match point down and then put a weak backhand into the net.
They embraced, and the delighted Serena blew kisses to the crowd, in the fashion of Andre Agassi. Venus acknow-ledged her poor show: "I have had better Grand Slam appearances in my life. I try not to be sad about every loss because I don't want to concen-trate on losses, it is not part of my life, it is just my work. After this I go home to reality."
Serena found suggestions that she would have preferred a different opponent laughable. "It is better that I won against Venus because we both took home the maximum amount of money and points," she said. "My money is going to Uncle Sam immediately, unfortunately."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments