LTA ditches 'irrelevant' championship

John Roberts
Wednesday 07 May 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The National Championships have been discarded by the Lawn Tennis Association, a decision likely to raise few dissenting voices. Started in 1983 and held indoors in October, the Nationals became known as the only tournament guaranteed British winners, a joke that quickly wore thin.

The original champions were Chris Bradnam, a coach, and Jo Durie, who was already established on the international scene. The sight of British players beating each other when few were a match for competitors from the rest of the world tended to make the exercise an irrelevance.

Tim Henman defeated Greg Rusedski in consecutive finals, in 1995 and 1996, when both were establishing themselves. In 1997, Henman was able to win his semi-final at the Nationals, dash from Telford to Hannover in Germany to play against Yevgeny Kafelnikov, and return in time to win the final of the Nationals.

David Felgate, Henman's former coach and now the LTA's director of performance, said yesterday: "I think it's the right decision. The event has served its purpose and its time. The way the calendar was when we started it fitted in nicely. But now there are so many challenger and satellites elsewhere where the players should be chasing ranking points."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in