Let Andy focus on singles life

 

Gillian Orr
Wednesday 12 September 2012 18:28 EDT
Comments
Andy Murray with his trophy and girlfriend Kim Sears
Andy Murray with his trophy and girlfriend Kim Sears (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Now that the British media (and public) can no longer harangue Andy Murray for failing to win a Grand Slam title after his glorious triumph at the US Open on Monday evening, it would seem that some quarters have decided to channel their sporting sneering into giving him grief over his love life instead.

The final question to be asked in Murray's post-victory press conference was about when he planned to wed long-term girlfriend Kim Sears, to which he merely replied: "I don't have any plans for it just now."

Which, predictably led to headlines like "Andy Marry" on the front page of the Daily Mirror yesterday, while the Daily Mail, in the type of speculation usually reserved for sad, sad unmarried Hollywood actresses in their thirties, ran the headline "Will Wimbledon be followed by wedding bells?" Being just 25 years old, such avid scrutiny of Murray is surely a touch premature. And, as the first British male to win a Grand Slam singles final in 76 years, can't we all just pat him on the back and leave it at that? Or at least nag him about winning Wimbledon instead.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in