Katie Boulter beaten by fifth seed Elina Svitolina in opening round of Australian Open
Boulter was beaten 6-4 7-5 by fifth seed Svitolina
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Katie Boulter made a promising return to grand slam tennis but was beaten 6-4 7-5 by fifth seed Elina Svitolina.
Boulter had not played at a slam since reaching the second round here 12 months ago after suffering a back injury at the Fed Cup in April that ruled her out for six months.
It was a very tough draw, and Boulter struck the ball well, racking up 27 winners to Svitolina’s 17, but ultimately the Ukrainian was the more composed on the big points.
Boulter said: “I felt like I had a chance the whole match. I knew if I could string a few points together here and there then I was in with a chance.
“I think I played some really good points but I also gave a lot away, which for me is quite disappointing because I expect better of myself. But it was a good match, I have to take the positives from it.
“I haven’t played a match like that in a very long time.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments