Tennis: Window on Wimbledon

Nick Callow
Saturday 20 June 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE SPECTATORS were getting better practice for Wimbledon than the players yesterday. As rain drove the Nottingham Open competitors to the soulless echoes of indoor carpet courts, 200 or so of the paying public, denied access to where the action was taking place, sat in the damp seats of an empty Centre Court to watch plastic court covers billowing in the wind.

Hardly memorable scenes of sporting drama, but they still stared intently, ice-creams and soggy crepes in hand, mindful of how useful these hours of rain training would be when the real storms inevitably fall when Wimbledon starts tomorrow.

A few had gathered at a thick window to catch glimpses of the tennis, but the majority stuck defiantly to the seats they had paid for, waiting for occasional updates on the scores from a public address system.

At 3.30 they were informed that Jonas Bjorkman of Sweden had beaten France's Jerome Golmard 6-2 2-6 6-3 in the second semi-final and would now play Zimbabwe's Byron Black, a 6-4 6-2 winner over Armenian Sargis Sargisian, in a final which they optimistically hoped to start, outside, on the grass, in an hour or so. They could even watch this match.

Nottingham is not seen as such a strong Wimbledon form guide as the preceding tournament at Queen's. But the latter was won by Scott Draper, a man with a played three, lost three Wimbledon record, and this final was contested by two players with merely one fourth round All England appearance between them, so the results this year are almost irrelevant in terms of predicting a Wimbledon winner.

That may be a bit harsh on Bjorkman as he is ranked nine in the world, volleys superbly and can disarm many a sonic serve with aggressive and reliable ground strokes from both flanks. But the fact remains that previous winners of the Nottingham Open (Rusedski, Siemerink and Frana) have never gone on to win Wimbledon.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in