Tennis: Wimbledon '97: Whitehouse the head boy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.You are never quite sure what you are seeing when you watch the boys final: future champions or budding burn-outs. Three years ago the title was won by Scott Humphries, who could well be driving the Sojourner buggy on Mars for all the impact he has made since. The runner-up, however, was Mark Philippoussis, writes Guy Hodgson.
Winners of junior Wimbledon have included Bjorn Borg, Pat Cash and Stefan Edberg but Rod Laver was slaughtered 6-1, 6-1 in the final of 1956. Nothing may breed success like success but among the boys, failure is not necessarily a full stop.
Daniel Elsner will hope not as he lost the final to South Africa's Wesley Whitehouse yesterday, halting what was confidently expected to be a swagger to the title. The German No 1 seed was beaten 6-3, 7-6 and is probably still kicking himself this morning.
Elsner has been touted as the next champion from a Rhur production line that forged Boris Becker and Michael Stich, if Tommy Hass or Nicolas Keifer do not beat him to it. He certainly has an "I don't give a first service what you think" demeanour, which is fine if you are winning but looks slightly incongruous otherwise. Only once, when he was leading 5-2 in the second set, did the keepy-uppy with the tennis ball look appropriate and he was soon tripping over his feet, losing his next serve to 30.
Whitehouse has a huge serve that secured him 12 aces to his opponent's two and that proved decisive in the tie-break, a thumping delivery proving too hot to return to win it 8-6. Not for the first time at Wimbledon, the big first stroke overwhelmed greater natural talent. But as Philippoussis has found, a good serve can take you a long way.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments