Swimming: Gillingham refused help for appeal

Monday 16 September 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nick Gillingham looks set to miss out on a third successive Olympic Games medal after failing to get backing for a legal challenge. The British Olympic Association has told him they have dropped plans to appeal on his behalf against the decision not to award him the 200m breaststroke bronze medal.

Gillingham was promoted to third in Atlanta when Andrei Korneev was stripped of his medal because of a positive drugs test, but the Russian was reinstated when it was ruled there was not sufficient evidence to establish the drug was covered by the Olympic Committees' medical code.

Gillingham, who would have become the first British swimmer to win a medal at three successive Games, was told at the time he would have the backing of the BOA in any appeal.

"I am bitterly disappointed at the decision," said Gillingham, who retired after the Games. "I believe there should be an appeal and I should have financial support to lodge an appeal. I have got to talk to a few people before deciding what to do next."

A BOA press officer, Pat Ewing, said they had taken the decision after discussions with their legal advisers. "We've told Nick that the decision is just not open to challenge from the BOA, the IOC or himself. We have every sympathy for his position."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in