Squash: Parke blames defeat on new seedings

Wednesday 28 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Simon Parke, the England international and world No 5, blamed a controversial new seeding system for his surprise first-round defeat by Ireland's Derek Ryan in the Hong Kong Open on Wednesday.

Parke, who is making a comeback after chemotherapy for testicular cancer, lost 15-11, 15-11, 2-15, 15-11 to the world No 15.

Parke said he was a victim of the new system - which cuts the number of seeded players from 16 to 8 - brought in by the Professional Squash Association. As a result, highly ranked players often meet in the first round of events. Parke said: "I do not think it was needed - everyone wants to change it back."

The second seed, Rodney Eyles of Australia, struggled to beat Zarak Jahan Khan, of Pakistan, who is ranked just eight places below him.

"It's a product of the system that I met him in the first round but the way I look at it if I did not play him in the first round I would have met him in the second," said Eyles, after his 15-6, 8-15, 15-10, 7-15, 15-12 victory.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in