Squash: England facing a boycott

Richard Eaton
Wednesday 06 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BOYCOTT of the English national championships, which most of the leading men have been threatening for more than a month, became a certainty yesterday. England is thus at risk of being without a proper team for both the world and European championships.

The Squash Rackets Association is sticking to England team criteria linking selection to participation in the nationals (one of the reasons for the boycott), even though it withdrew its threat to cancel the men's national championships in Manchester next week if the boycotters refused a peace plan. All but the England captain, Phil Whitlock, did so, thus only two of the top 16 could be in today's draw, featuring 51 mostly lesser players.

'We remain disappointed that some of the top male players have decided not to play, but respect their freedom to make their own decisions,' Chris Gotla, the SRA chief executive, said.

Another shift of policy, perhaps giving England a chance of defending the world's silver medal position it achieved last time, may also be possible. Gotla yesterday offered to host next month's players' meeting in London, and said that England's selection criteria, like other SRA policies, were part of 'a review process'.

If there is no change in this, the remarkable loyalty which Peter Marshall has shown the rebels will be tested. The British national champion has supported the boycott even though he, like Whitlock, agrees with the peace plan, and even though he and England's No 2, Chris Walker, remain technically eligible for selection by England because, by qualifying for the Super Series final in Zurich, they gain exemption from the national championships.

Marshall says he agreed to abide by a players' majority vote and for this reason has lent his name to the boycotting list. If players on this list are excluded from consideration from England, then Marshall and Walker will refuse, so they say, to play for their country.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in