Sports Letters: Why the law on rucking is an ass
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The number of penalty kicks which punctuated last Saturday's Calcutta Cup match (22, equating to about one every 3.5 minutes) is a sad reflection on the complexity of the rules in modern rugby union. That one final, rather dubious, refereeing decision robbing Scotland of a fully deserved victory was unfortunate, but perhaps not so surprising when one considers that a high percentage of the punishable indiscretions appeared to arise from rucking situations or loose play.
It appears that the present laws concerning the ruck are sufficiently ill-defined to have warranted a preliminary meeting between Jim Telfer, the Scottish Rugby Union's director of rugby, and the match referee, Lindsay McLachlan, before the match.
This implies either that certain aspects of the game require clarification or that each referee applies his own idiosyncratic interpretation. If this is the case then it is hardly surprising that so many infringements result from loose play if players have to adapt their game to each referee's standards.
So I ask myself the simple question 'When is a ruck a ruck?'. The honest answer is that I am now as confused as ever. For a ruck to occur does the ball have to make contact with the ground as opposed to it resting on a pile of prostrate bodies? Perhaps now is the time for the game's governing body to go 'back to basics' and attempt to resolve the present inconsistencies which may influence a referee's decision.
Yours sincerely,
JK DUNN
Hardwick, Cambridge.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments