Sports Letters: Talking referees
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Now that another international rugby union season is nearly upon us, the clamour over the new rules gets louder, as the players try to guess at the referee's interpretation. Pity then the poor fans.
I have watched international matches with ex-internationals who could not interpret more than half the stoppages. As august a commentator as Bill McLaren is still often heard to interpret penalty calls with 'I think the referee may have spotted something in the line-out'.
We import far too many things of suspect value from America, but their system for communicating decisions to spectators in American football games is admirable.
It is high time paying spectators were allowed to know exactly what they are spectating.
Yours sincerely,
BLAIN FAIRMAN
London, W4
30 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments