SPORTS LETTERS: Rugby fudge

P. Foster
Wednesday 29 March 1995 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr P Foster

Sir: Steve Bale ("League exiles freed for return to union", l5 March) mocks David Hinchcliffe, MP, for his apparent lack of enthusiasm over the recent International Rugby Board ruling that former league professionals will be allowed to play non-representative rugby union again, providing that they abstain from playing rugby for a minimum three-year period.

Mr Hinchcliffe though is right to assert that "bigoted discrimination" remains. Professional rugby players are singled out for discrimination by the IRB while other professional sportsmen and women are not. Any ex- soccer, tennis or American football professional wanting to play rugby union would be welcome to do so. Indeed, Naas Botha, the former Springbok, left rugby union to kick goals in professional American football and returned to captain South Africa. Compare this with the shabby treatment of Steve Pilgrim, the Wasps player who had a trial with Leeds rugby league club for which he received no payment and was banned from playing union for 12 months.

The IRB ruling is a fudge.

Yours sincerely.

PAUL FOSTER,

London SW19 3AY

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in