Sports Letters: Padded extras

Mr J. Bardwaj
Wednesday 31 March 1993 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is just not cricket that a batsman with a poor technique against spin bowling can pad away with impunity most balls bowled to him. I propose that such 'batsmen' should be hit where it hurts them most - in the scorebook. Whenever there is deliberate padding up the umpire should signal, say, a non-bye and the scorers deduct a run from the offending batsman or from his team's total if he is out in the red. The leg-before- wicket rule remains unchanged. According to my calculations, during one of the sessions in the recent Test matches in India, England batsmen registered a minus score.

Yours faithfully,

JITEN BARDWAJ

Hertford

23 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in