Sports Letters: Beyond our ken

Mr S. Cheetham
Wednesday 28 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: While having some sympathy with Ken Jones's plea ('Greed a blight on the future'; 22 July) for a return to the days when a footballer's maximum wage was pounds 12 per week and a fish and chip supper and a night at the pictures would cost you less than five bob, does Mr Jones really expect football to be so far removed from the real world?

I grant you, Neil Ruddock's demand for three years' loyalty payment from Tottenham was outrageous.

But were he and his agent, the charming Eric Hall, really doing anything more than any union leader would do?

Ruddock and Hall wanted pounds 150,000; Tottenham told them their demand was 'unbelievable', then still went ahead and paid them pounds 50,000.

A piece of industrial negotiation that would not have looked out of place at the TUC.

I agree with Ken Jones's initial point that money has taken a hold of our national game, but what can anyone do about it? Agents, TV and sponsors are not going to disappear. The wheel has been invented.

Ruddock's game plan is quite clear. Make as many big-money moves as he can while his stock is still high. The situation now is that even a mediocre player has an agent, eagerly seeking out opportunities to earn another 10 per cent. A good solid one-club man is no good to an agent. The cut from Trevor Brooking's career wouldn't have paid Eric Hill's cigar bill.

The bottom line is, though, the clubs bleat and moan how they are being bled dry by players continually demanding more and more excessive payments. They frown and scowl, they shake their heads and look to the heavens. Then they pay out.

The only way to stop the ever-increasing spiral is for the clubs to say 'enough is enough' - and mean it.

But when the rewards for success can be counted in the tens of millions, chairmen, managers, agents and players will continue to sell football's soul for just 10 per cent more.

Yours with a firm handshake

SIMON CHEETHAM

Stoke Mandeville, Bucks

22 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in