Snooker: Silence over O'Sullivan drug allegations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.RONNIE O'SULLIVAN was at the centre of another impending controversy last night when it was alleged he had failed a drugs test. The silence, in true diplomatic fashion, was deafening.
Neither his manager, Ian Doyle, nor the governing body, the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association, would comment on reports alleging the 22-year-old UK champion had tested positive for cannabis during an invitation event in Ireland in March which he won. Instead O'Sullivan must wait until a second sample is tested by Sports Council officials today in London.
Doyle referred the matter to his Glasgow-based solicitor, Jerry Sinclair. "There is a set procedure which has to be followed by WPBSA," Sinclair said. "Part of that procedure involves a second test.''
O'Sullivan faces at least a four-figure fine if it proves positive and he is later disciplined by the governing body.
There is also the question of previous misdemeanours, the most serious of which was an assault on a press officer during the 1996 World Championships in Sheffield. He was fined pounds 20,000 and had a two-year ban suspended for two years and, even though the allegation this time is of a different nature, it falls within that period.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments