Scottish Football: Disparate visions of the future

David McKinney
Sunday 17 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SCOTLAND'S top clubs continue to seek change and, after voting down the Scottish League's proposal for divisions of 14-12-12 last week, it has become open season for interested parties to put forward their own vision of the future, writes David McKinney.

Jack Steedman, the Clydebank chairman, will circulate clubs with his plan for divisions of 16-12-10 this week, a proposal which is doomed to failure, given the current level of support for a smaller top tier.

More realistic is a bid by St Johnstone to have 10 teams in a Premier Division, in a proposal to be published this week.

Whatever direction the game takes, there is likely to be a degree of animosity among the top clubs, following Celtic's decision to vote against their Super League colleagues last Thursday and their subsequent complaint to the Scottish Football Association over comments made by directors of other clubs. David Murray of Rangers, the Aberdeen vice-chairman, Ian Donald, and Jim Oliver, the

Aberdeen vice-chairman, Ian Donald, and Jim Oliver, the chairman of Partick Thistle, all face disrepute charges.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in