Sailing: Jury's judgement short on appeal

Stuart Alexander
Saturday 18 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Amid threats to remove yachts from the race, criticism of their competence and even talk of civil law cases, the international panel that hears disputes in the Whitbread Race has agreed to meet yet againtoday to consider the award of 21.5 hours to Dennis Conner's Winston for turning back when the Italian yacht Brookfield was in distress during the second leg, writes Stuart Alexander from Fremantle. Challenging the jury are three of the four who originally cried 'too much': Lawrie Smith, who won the leg, New Zealand's Ross Field and Spain's Javier de la Gandara, who also said yesterday he would be writing to the race director, Ian Bailey-Willmot, asking for the present jury, chaired by Belgium's Marcel Leeman, to be sacked. The managers of Smith's Interum Justitia had earlier said that if the jury did not change its decision they would 'seriously consider withdrawing from the 1993-4 Whitbread Round the World Race.' Winston's captain, Brad Butterworth, is keeping well clear, although he thinks he should have been given even more time. He asked for over 26 hours. Even so, he was given a time only 67 seconds slower than the record set by Smith for the 8,000-mile leg from Uruguay, allowing him to jump from fifth to second.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in