Wheeler fined for criticising referee

Wyn Griffiths
Thursday 08 August 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter Wheeler, the Leicester Tigers' chief executive, was last night fined £3,000 and ordered to pay £250 costs for publicly criticising the match referee Steve Lander following the Premiership game against Bristol Shoguns on 5 May.

Wheeler appeared before a Rugby Football Union disciplinary hearing after a complaint from the West Country club about comments he made in a local newspaper column.

The Tigers' chief was found not guilty of two charges relating to comments about some of Bristol's squad and their then coach Dean Ryan, and a third of failing to take all possible steps to prevent the game from being brought into disrepute.

Wheeler, who represents Premier Rugby on the RFU's management board, criticised Lander for red carding the Shoguns' England prop Julian White and Leicester's Adam Balding for fighting but then not dismissing the Shoguns' lock Garath Archer and Leicester's Peter Short for doing the same.

Bristol's owner Malcolm Pearce said: "It appears that the panel were only concerned about comments made about one of their officials. They have seen fit to permit adverse comments about our coach at the time and some of our players and this was our prime concern in making the complaint."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in