RFU gives rucking a reprieve
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Test cricket may be in a state of diplomatic turmoil as a result of the fun and games at the Oval, but rugby union is the sport most profoundly at risk. At least it would have been, but for a late change of tack by Twickenham officials who had been planning to introduce automatic red-card dismissals for any player placing his boot on the body of an opponent during the Premiership campaign, which begins on Saturday week.
Yesterday, the Rugby Football Union's disciplinary officer, Commodore Jeff Blackett, confirmed that traditional rucking would continue to be permitted within the strict guidelines in place last season.
The chorus of "thank heaven for that" from every director of rugby in the country, not to mention the overwhelming majority of senior referees, bordered on the deafening. Had the initiative to outlaw one of the union game's defining characteristics been put into effect, there would have been ructions - not least from the England management, who will attempt to defend the World Cup in France next year against southern-hemisphere teams who have spent much of the current Tri-Nations tournament rucking with renewed vigour.
No serious rugby follower would grant head-kickers and stampers a licence to maim, but they are keen to see a clearing of the tackle area. The breakdown is littered with players who hit the deck to interfere with possession. Without any prospect of being rucked the ball-killers would have a free rein. Now the defenders of the ruck have won the argument, the Premiership at least has an opportunity to lay on dynamic entertainment for crowds expected to exceed last season's record-breaking average of 10,000.
Not that there is complete clarity as the 12 top-flight clubs prepare for the resumption of hostilities. Their laudable efforts to erase one of the great stains on the game, the uncontested scrum, appear to have been scuppered by the International Rugby Board, who insist that any change of law must be delayed until November, when the committee types next meet.
Uncontested scrums, which arise when a team is unable to field a full front row because of injury, were introduced on safety grounds, but have been discredited recently, with weak scrummaging sides using it as a "get out of jail free" card. The French, who enjoy a proper scrum, brought in a measure under which the team responsible for moving to uncontested set-pieces forfeited a player and spent the rest of the match a man down. The result? Not a single incident in the whole of last season's domestic championship.
"We have done our planning on the basis that this system will be used in the Premiership," said Colin High, who manages England's élite referees, "but ultimately, we work for the Rugby Football Union, who are seeking clarification from the IRB. If the RFU direct us otherwise, then we'll do as we're told."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments