Howarth, Sinkinson, Hilton plead their cases to IRB

Ap
Monday 01 May 2000 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rugby Union's International Board will rule on Wednesday whether New Zealand-born Shane Howarth and Brett Sinkinson should have played for Wales and Englishman David Hilton was right to have played 41 times for Scotland.

In the biggest eligibility scandal ever to have hit one of the world's oldest sports, the IRB set up a three-man judication panel to decide whether the three stars deliberately lied to play international rugby for another country.

Howarth and Sinkinson have both said they believed they had Welsh grandparents while Hilton thought his grandfather was born in Edinburgh. In each case, documentary evidence suggested all three were wrong.

The scandal cast a cloud on this season's Six Nations Championship with Wales unable to field fullback Howarth and forward Sinkinson and prop forward Hilton forced out of the vital final game against, coincidentally, the English.

The panel of leading rugby officials, Jannie Lubbe, South Africa, John Spencer, England, and Ronnie Dawson, Ireland, listened to the comments of all three players on Tuesday as well as several witnesses they called to the meeting at IRB headquarters in Dublin.

The panel is expected to give its decisions on Wednesday and its rulings could set precedents in what has become a gray area.

Team officials have usually taken players on their own word for deciding eligibility while critics have argued that players such as Howarth, Sinkinson and Hilton, chose to play for Wales or Scotland because they were unable to get on the much stronger New Zealand or English lineups.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in