Bath trio found guilty over failure to take drug tests

Lipman, Crockett and Higgins suspended for nine months after RFU ruling

David Llewellyn
Monday 03 August 2009 19:00 EDT
Comments
(GETTY IMAGES)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three Bath players, Michael Lipman, Alex Crockett and Andrew Higgins, were last night suspended for nine months each after being found guilty of failing to submit to two drugs tests.

The bans followed a four-day disciplinary hearing in London when the trio appeared before a Rugby Football Union's disciplinary panel chaired by Judge Jeff Blackett.

The three players were ruled to have failed on two separate occasions to provide drug tests after an end-of-season celebration in London because "they believed there was a risk of positive results".

The suspension – reduced from 15 months because of the players' good character and the panel's perception of the legal advice which they took – has been back-dated to start on 1 June, the day all three terminated their contracts with Bath.

The judgement concluded: "The RFU disciplinary panel today takes no pleasure in imposing its sanction as the players involved are decent young men. There are good policy reasons why those who fail to take tests and those who give positive tests should receive the same sanction. There is also a need for a strong deterrent in this sanction.

Although the three players have terminated their Bath contracts, the result of the hearing, which began last Wednesday, still leaves the West Country club's reputation badly tarnished. Early last month a fourth player, former Australian international lock Justin Harrison was given an eight month ban after admitting three similar drug-related charges, including taking cocaine, in a separate RFU hearing.

A fifth Bath player, England prop Matt Stevens, is presently serving a two-match suspension after testing positive for cocaine last December. He subsequently parted company with the club.

The three players had originally been accused of conduct prejudicial to the interests of the game on a number of charges, including "taking prohibited substances and wilful refusal to take a drugs test".

However shortly before the start of the hearing the charges of taking drugs were dropped.

When the RFU first brought the charges the players, who had vowed to contest the allegations vigorously, issued a collective statement which read: "This is a matter that we take very seriously and will do everything possible in order to clear our names."

Lipman, Crockett and Higgins terminated their Bath contracts after being accused by the club of failing to take a drugs test on three occasions following an end-of-season celebration in London on 10 May. The players quit immediately before they were due to appear before an internal disciplinary hearing, claiming their positions at the club "had become untenable".

They also said Bath's investigation had been misled by an anonymous source making "scurrilous and unsubstantiated" claims. The RFU then launched their own investigation, led by Twickenham's disciplinary manager Bruce Rees-Russell.

On 17 June, the RFU charged all three players, stating that it was their intention to call on "a number of players, club management and other third parties to appear before the panel to support the case."

Last night Premier Rugby, which runs the elite end of the club game, welcomed the verdict. Chief executive Mark McCafferty said: "The ruling has strengthened the Premiership clubs' determination to take appropriate action to protect the core values of our sport. Our priority is to implement the new education and discipline programmes for the 2009-10 season to address these risks."

Q&A What's going on at Bath?

*Who was in the dock?

Michael Lipman, 29, flanker, Alex Crockett, 27, centre, and Andrew Higgins, 28, centre.

*Charges faced?

Rule 5.12 – conduct prejudicial to the interests of the game, includes wilful refusal to take drugs test.

*Who else has been banned?

Matt Stevens' received a two-year ban in February after a positive cocaine test, and Justin Harrison was given an eight-month ban for admitting taking illegal drugs at a hearing.

*Is there a drug crisis in rugby?

Martin Johnson does not believe so: "You can never be complacent, but in my experience there isn't a widespread problem."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in