Rugby Union: Protocol for transfers

Steve Bale
Monday 10 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ENGLISH rugby union's transfer market - the illicit but never officially detected inducements which prompt players to change clubs - has drawn Twickenham to draw up a written code of conduct which it hopes will be more effective than simple self-regulation, writes Steve Bale.

Unfortunately the new system will also depend on self-regulation. There is nothing in the new rules which will actually prevent contravention. The secret will still be not to get caught.

As Bob Rogers of the Rugby Football Union put it: 'Even though there's a law against murder, people still commit murder.' It is a decent attempt, put in the form of a document released by the RFU yesterday and circulated to all member clubs for comment before the end of June. It clearly defines what is permissible under the wilting flower of amateurism.

A complaints procedure will be set up under which a tribunal will investigate alleged breaches with power to reprimand, suspend or ban individual players, and/or reprimand, deduct up to six league points, relegate, exclude, suspend or expel clubs. These are measures nearly all of which were already at the union's disposal.

It is the RFU's response to a mountain of allegation without proof. 'If it's allowed to continue it merely descends into whoever has the biggest cheque-book has the strongest team,' Dudley Wood, the secretary, said. 'Nobody wants to see that.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in