Rugby Union: Epruc threat to England

David Llewellyn
Monday 13 January 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Representatives of the English Professional Rugby Union Clubs and Twickenham officials were frantically arranging for an urgent meeting last night to try to safeguard England's Five Nations campaign.

A meeting of both teams of negotiators is to be set up within the next 48 hours at which the Rugby Football Union will be asked to explain why a perfectly valid set of clauses in what has come to be known as the Leicester Agreement underwent changes before going for signing by the 24 member clubs of Epruc. Failure to satisfy the clubs in the matter could result in players being withheld from the national squads.

One Epruc official, Charles Levison of Wasps, described the non-release of players by the clubs as "a very real threat". According to Northampton's millionaire backer, Keith Barwell, the redrafted agreement makes no mention of a non-voting player's representative on the board of the proposed new governing body of the club game, Newco, and that a clause allowing members of the board to stand for one year only was introduced.

But according to one member of the RFU's team, any differences between the Leicester Agreement and the version that has been sent out to clubs for signing by 20 January, have to be put down to errors on the part of the legal team drawing up the agreement.

The signs are that peace will break out again; but there were worried frowns all round until late yesterday, when placatory noises issued from both sides. "There is no question of not having a players' representative on the board of Newco," said an RFU source. And evidence that Epruc are equally eager to overcome this latest little niggle came when the Leicester president, Peter Wheeler, a director of Epruc, said: "I've spoken to most of the RFU negotiating team and their lawyers and I am fairly happy that they wish that documentation to reflect the agreement."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in