Rhodes back to front

Q&A

Saturday 28 February 1998 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Q. After his century last Sunday week, is Pat Symcox of South Africa to be considered the best No 10 batsman ever or has another tailender fared even better?

A. Wilfred Rhodes (1877-1973) figured originally in both the Yorkshire and England teams as a bowler. Indeed, in the famous one-wicket victory over Australia at Old Trafford in 1902, Rhodes batted at No 11, joining Hirst at the crease when 15 runs were need to win.

Rhodes went on to become an opening bat, partnering Jack Hobbs - together they put on 323 at Melbourne in 1911-12. Overall he scored 39,802 first- class runs at an average of 30.83 and 2,325 Test runs at 30.19. Rhodes also took that little matter of 4,187 first-class wickets, a record destined to last for all time.

Undoubtedly, the best "tailender".

Tim Mickleburgh, Grimsby

ANSWERS PLEASE

Q. In 1966, England won the World Cup after playing all their matches at Wembley. Have any other national team been in a position to emulate that feat by playing all their matches on their home ground?

Keith Markland, Ilkley

Q. In Test cricket nowadays, the wicket-keeper often seems to stand facing extra-cover. Why is this?

Anthony Perkins, Lancaster

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in