Racing: Jockeys confused by false-start fiasco
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOCKEYS AND punters were bewildered by the start of the final race of the day at Chepstow yesterday. The five runners appeared to get away cleanly, but racegoers clearly heard first the racecourse judge, and then commentator Derek Thompson, say that a false start had taken place.
The riders could be seen talking among themselves in the early stages of the race, apparently unsure of what to do, but they elected to race on. At the end, 8-11 favourite Water Flower battled off Gypsy Hill in a driving finish.
But as soon as the race was over, the track stewards called an inquiry, with everyone left unsure as to whether the race would be declared void. But, after a short delay, it was announced that the result would stand, the stewards being "satisfied that the race had been started correctly".
As part of the inquiry, they interviewed the starter, the starter's signaller and the judge, and viewed a video recording of the start together with the announcement, and a confidential report will be sent to the Jockey Club.
Thompson, a presenter of Channel 4 Racing, added: "I heard the judge so I thought there must have been a false start and I called it too. But then they kept going and I couldn't believe it was happening. I was just passing on what I had heard, I'm completely innocent.''
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments