Sweetenham blames stage fright for medal flops

Nick Harris
Sunday 22 August 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"Rome Was not built in a day, but it can and will be built." That was the stirring, defiant message yesterday from Bill Sweetenham, the national performance director of British Swimming, after the conclusion of the eight-day Olympic meet here.

"Rome Was not built in a day, but it can and will be built." That was the stirring, defiant message yesterday from Bill Sweetenham, the national performance director of British Swimming, after the conclusion of the eight-day Olympic meet here.

The Australian's "realistic target" of two British medals in the pool at these Games was reached in enthralling fashion on Saturday night, when Cardiff's 19-year-old David Davies swam the race of his life to win bronze in the fastest 1500m freestyle Olympic final ever. Yet Sweetenham knows he has critics who will denounce his team's overall performance as poor and blame him.

His own take, rightly, is that things are heading in the right direction. After Britain won no medals in Sydney four years ago, two bronzes here - from Davies, and from Stephen Parry in the 200m butterfly - was no "shame Games" repeat. Ten individuals made finals here, as against five in Sydney. Five relay teams here had shots at medals, albeit unsuccessful, by making finals.

But Sweetenham did not flinch from candid assessments of how things might have been better and what needs to be done to make them so.

"The team was physically as well prepared as any other team," he said. "But we had Olympic phobia constantly present in our preparations." This was a reference to the Sydney hangover but also, effectively, an admission of mental weaknesses on the biggest stage.

"We need a stronger coach development programme offering greater depth of experience to coaches and to include, as a priority, big-meet psychology development," he said. He added that this was the area of British swimming that had most room for improvement. "It's not what you do, it's how you do it," he said.

Ten countries won more medals in the pool than Britain. In mitigation, Sweetenham argued that that was because more nations are now competitive at the top level. He should have added that China, like Britain, only won two medals.

"Australia took 20 years, from 1980 to 2000, to build its programme," he said. "Australia has great weather, a large budget and lots of facilities, all three of which we don't have."

What Britain does have is potential, and it is being tapped. With talent, guts and fearlessness, Davies smashed the British record to come within 2.55sec of the world No 1, Grant Hackett. Davies could yet become the bedrock on which Sweetenham builds his Rome.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in