Olympic poster star gives up on 2012 in funding row

Terri Judd
Thursday 16 February 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

He was pictured vaulting over the "Gherkin" Swiss Re tower to the slogan "Leap for London" in an image that helped the capital secure the 2012 Olympic Games. But reality has proved far less glamorous for Ben Brown, 21, who has been unable to secure the £15,000 he needs to train full time. He has quit gymnastics and is working in a bank.

Along with Daniel Carter, 18, who was on the world-class potential programme with British Gymnastics, Mr Brown has abandoned the sport competitively.

Sporting groups urged the Government yesterday to inject much-needed investment for athletes to give them the best chance in the 2012 Games and inspire future generations of children.

Mr Brown, who took up the sport aged seven and trained at Sutton School of Gymnastics in Surrey, said: "I can't really blame anybody specifically for the fact that I've had to give up, but I believe the Government has a lot to answer for."

There was plenty of money to create a London arena, he said, "but not a penny is being spent on the young British athletes who might bring home a gold medal". Mr Carter added the decision to quit had been difficult. "If they funded me just £2,000 a year, which is quite minimal, I would carry on with it," he said.

UK Sport, which distributes funding, has told the Chancellor that to achieve the highest possible result in 2012 - fourth place in the medals table - an extra £49.4m must be put towards sport annually for the next seven years.

There were mounting calls yesterday for an immediate announcement as to whether or not this money would be forthcoming. Matthew Greenwood, the performance director of British Gymnastics, the sport's governing body, said the delay in a funding decision was of great concern.

"In our junior ranks we have an awful lot of good competitors. We feel very confident within Great Britain that we have the talent." But he warned: "The clock is ticking. Every day that goes by is a day closer to the Games."

With the 2012 qualification cycle for the men's gymnastics team beginning in 2010, Mr Greenwood said: "The more time that goes by, the more difficult the chance to qualify becomes."

Lord Moynihan, the chairman of the British Olympic Association (BOA), said the loss of athletes through a lack of funding was an example of the devastating effect such confusions and delays could have at the sharp end of sport.

"The BOA hopes that an announcement on future funding is made as soon as possible. We cannot afford to waste another day," he said. "We should be giving our athletes the best chance to reach the medal rostrum at the Olympics in 2012. Such success will inspire generations of children to take up sport, and that surely is the most important legacy of London 2012."

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport defended its funding policy for sport, which it said had tripled under the current government.

"UK Sport will invest £98m between now and the end of the Beijing Olympics in 2008," a spokeswoman said. "Gymnastics will have received £11.1m between 1997 and 2009 to support their best athletes. In addition, £40m has been invested since 1994 in the development of the sport."

She added: "We are in discussions with UK Sport and the Treasury about funding up to 2012."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in