Leading figures demand ban on Olympic sponsor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than a hundred politicians, academics, Olympians, actors and human rights groups have called on Olympics organisers to review a sponsorship deal with Dow Chemical over its treatment of victims of the Bhopal gas disaster.
The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) awarded Dow Chemical the rights to produce and fund a fabric "wrap" to cover the 2012 Olympic Stadium.
A letter signed by academic Noam Chomsky, Martin Sheen, Ken Livingstone and a host of Indian Olympians and politicians argues that the deal "is a stain on the ambitions of the Olympics," and have called for organisers to reconsider.
Up to 15,000 people are thought to have been killed and tens of thousands more maimed when poisonous gas leaked from the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal in central India in 1984.
Dow bought Union Carbide in 2001 but denies responsibility for Carbide's Bhopal liabilities. It said a £288m settlement with those affected was fair and final.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments