Olympic medical chief backs decision to warn Riley
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Swimming
The Olympics' chief medical official yesterday applauded the international swimming federation, Fina, for only warning Samantha Riley, a world champion, after a positive drug test.
"I am very satisfied," said Prince Alexandre de Merode, the chairman of the International Olympic Committee medical commission. "I think they made a decision that is fair and just. I think it was an intelligent interpretation of the rules. This decision gives credibility to the anti-doping fight."
Fina announced on Tuesday that it had issued a "strong warning" to Riley after she failed a drug test at the World Short-course Championships in Brazil on 1 December. The Australian swimmer, the world 100 and 200 metres breaststroke champion, tested positive for the drug dextroproposyphene, which was in a banned headache tablet given to her by her coach, Scott Volkers.
Fina could have banned Riley for two years, but it decided against that because the product "had no potential to enhance her performance or give her an unfair advantage."
Fina, however, took a tough line against Volkers, banning him "from all swimming activities" for two years.
De Merode said Riley's urine sample turned up only a "weak" level of the drug, which he compared to an aspirin. He acknowledged that Volker's two-year suspension was harsh but said it was justified. "An athlete is under the control of responsible people who should be careful about their actions," he said. "It is a severe penalty, definitely, but it makes people who have responsibility for others think twice."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments