French Grand Prix sales success marred by flaws in television coverage

David Tremayne
Monday 05 July 2004 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Against all odds, the French Grand Prix was a success. The promoter Jacques Regis - one of the men behind the imminent departure of Max Mosley as president of the sport's governing body, the FIA - needed 55,000 paying spectators on raceday to break even. He got 70,000, and 135,000 over the three days.

Against all odds, the French Grand Prix was a success. The promoter Jacques Regis - one of the men behind the imminent departure of Max Mosley as president of the sport's governing body, the FIA - needed 55,000 paying spectators on raceday to break even. He got 70,000, and 135,000 over the three days.

It was proof that there is still a strong appetite for Formula One, if the price is right. Ticket prices in France and Britain have been reduced this year, and both events boasted strong support races - Formula 3000 and Porsche Supercup. Magny-Cours also had two rounds of the Formula Three Euroseries.

The quality of the competition apart, what let things down was the abysmal and partisan television coverage. This is not the first time that a local director has followed 'his' cars to the exclusion of virtually everything else. David Coulthard and Kimi Raikkonen fought for half of Sunday's race, but you'd never have known it from the television.

The days of sponsors throwing limitless money at any sport in return for exposure at the heart of the action are long gone; these days every marketing director wants a second-by-second breakdown of the coverage his brand has received. The sport's other abiding problem is that modern telephoto lenses, while vastly improving visibility, reduce the impression of speed.

Back in the days of Bernie Ecclestone's ill-starred digital television, fans were treated to great television feed, generated by professionals thoroughly versed in their craft. This is not the case today, and no matter how good the commentary, days like last Sunday serve as an unpalatable reminder. It's time for the teams to organise themselves sufficiently to generate the money to do the job properly again, and to do themselves a commercial favour.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in