Maximum Security: Owner of horse disqualified from Kentucky Derby pulls out of Preakness, vowing to fight ruling
Owner Gary West says he was 'stunned, shocked and in total disbelief' about the disqualification
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The owner of Maximum Security, the horse that finished first in the Kentucky Derby but was later disqualified for interference, has been denied the right to appeal the decision.
Gary West, whose horse became the first winner to be disqualified for an on-track infraction, said that the dramatic turn on events at Churchill Downs left him "stunned, shocked and in total disbelief".
But his appeal against the disqualification was denied by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.
It called the request "moot" because the decision to disqualify Maximum Security and install second-placed Country House as winner was not subject to appeal.
"The stewards unanimously disqualified Maximum Security following two objections lodged immediately after the 145th running of the Kentucky Derby and after a thorough review of the race replay," the commission wrote in a letter. "That determination is not subject to an appeal."
After a 20-minute video review, officials found that Maximum Security, who was 4-1 favourite to win the 1-1/4 mile race, was guilty of a contact foul when he appeared to take a wide turn and impede other horses in the home stretch.
The disqualification ruling handed the win to Country House, which had been a 65-1 long shot.
After losing the appeal Mr withdrew his steed from the upcoming Preakness Stakes race, saying that there is no reason for him to risk the animal if it can’t win the Triple Crown
“I think there is no Triple Crown on the line for us, and there is no reason to run a horse back in two weeks when you don't have to,” Mr West said in an interview with NBC’s TODAY show.
He added: “I think this is something that's big enough that the entire racing world is looking at this, and I think they deserve an opportunity to really know what was going on."
Churchill Downs Racetrack President Kevin Flanery said that the infraction by Maximum Security had nothing to do with the number of horses in the race and that there is no evidence to the contrary.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments