Judgement day for the judges

SPORT-BY-SPORT GUIDE No 10: BOXING

Glyn Leach
Tuesday 16 July 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Eyes down for another round of outrageous adjudication, sit-ins and God knows what else. Or perhaps not. The Olympic boxing tournament has cleaned up its act somewhat since the farce of the 1988 Seoul Games. Threatened with removal from the Olympics, boxing had no choice.

Barcelona passed with little controversy. Much of the credit must go to the criticised computer scoring system, employed for the first time at the 1992 Games. The nightmare judging of Seoul is prevented by a system which demands that for a point to be awarded, three of the five judges must press a scoring button at the same time. Judges found to be consistently out of line with the consensus opinion are weeded out.

But while Seoul was a disaster, the previous tournament in Los Angeles also raised questions. American fighters hardly lost a round, let alone a fight. Admittedly, the 1984 US squad had strength in depth, spawning professional champions such as Evander Holyfield, Pernell Whitaker, Meldrick Taylor and Mark Breland, but the Atlanta tournament will be scrutinised as the USA clamours for success.

The omens for fair play are not good. At a pre-Olympic tournament in Atlanta, the Thai bantamweight Vichai Khadpo suffered a shocking loss to an American. The judges deemed that Khadpo, the world No 1, had not landed a single scoring punch. Rip-offs, it seems, are not solely a Korean prerogative.

As ever, the bulk of the medals in the 12 weight categories are expected to be shared by Cuba and the USA, the only nations to field competitors in every division. While boxers from other nations compete in international tournaments which serve as Olympic qualifiers, the Cuban and American national championships produce automatic Olympians. Potentially dubious officiating notwithstanding, American success is far from guaranteed. At Barcelona, Cuba took seven golds compared with Oscar De La Hoya's lone triumph for the USA. America's strongest hope is the light-heavyweight Antonio Tarver, who should prevent a whitewash if the Cubans run rampage.

BRITISH TEAM: Featherweight: David Burke (Salisbury). Heavyweight: Fola Okesola (Lynn BC, London).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in