Ice Skating: Harding's problem

Wednesday 29 June 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EVEN though Tonya Harding resigned from the US Figure Skating Association after the attack on Nancy Kerrigan, the association has begun disciplinary hearing that could strip her of her national championship and ban her from membership for life.

'We have to maintain the integrity of the sport,' said Nancy Piro, chairwoman of the association's ethics committee and a member of the panel that will decide Harding's fate.

Harding will not participate in the hearing and will not be represented. Her lawyer, Bob Weaver, sent a letter to the panel outlining his contention that it lacks authority to take action because Harding is no longer a member of the association.

Under the association's bylaws, Harding could appeal against the inquiry's findings to the association's executive committee, and then to an independent arbitrator.

'Arguably, there's an appeal process, but that's assuming they have jurisdiction over Tonya to begin with,' Weaver said. 'We're not conceding that they have jurisdiction at all.'

The five-member panel decided in February that there were reasonable grounds to believe that Harding either was in on the plot to attack Kerrigan, knew about the plan and failed to report it, or made false statements about her knowledge of it.

It scheduled a hearing for March, but Harding went to court and won a postponement, arguing that she did not have enough time to prepare a defence.

The US Olympic Committee is awaiting the outcome of the hearing to determine whether it will take any action. Harding went to court to block the USOC's disciplinary hearing and, as a result, was allowed to compete in this year's Winter Olympics.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in