Norman: Tiger 'better than Niklaus' under pressure

Reuters
Thursday 02 April 2009 08:11 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"I think he and (Jack) Nicklaus are equal inside six feet. Outside nine feet, Woods is by far the best you've ever seen play the game."

Norman, one of the most charismatic players in the game, believes Woods was a better ball striker in 2000 and 2001 when he won an unprecedented four consecutive majors.

"His ball striking is not as good now but his mind is better and his putting is better," the Australian said. "His putting now (added) to his ball striking in 2000, he would win every golf tournament by four, five or six shots."

Current world number one Woods, a winner of 14 major titles, trails only fellow American Nicklaus (18) in the all-time standings.

He has long targeted golf's 'Holy Grail' of 19 majors or more and has twice remodelled his swing to become a better and more consistent player.

After clinching his 14th major at last year's US Open, Woods had reconstructive knee surgery and was sidelined from the game for eight months while recovering.

Remarkably, he won his 66th PGA Tour title at last week's Arnold Palmer Invitational in only his third comeback event, denting Phil Mickelson's faint hopes of taking over at the top.

Had Woods not triumphed in Orlando, second-ranked Mickelson would have become world number one for the first time with victory at this week's Houston Open.

Asked about the relative strengths of Woods and Mickelson, Norman replied: "Both approach the game of golf to win and whatever happens after that is secondary, to tell you the truth.

"If you look at all the categories that they go through - driving, long iron, medium iron, short iron and sand play -- I think they're both pretty much the same.

"I think Tiger has got him on the mental edge and Tiger has got him outside nine feet, and that would be my assessment on the two.

"It's good for the game of golf to have two guys vying for it," added Norman, a winner of 20 PGA Tour titles whose only two major victories came at the 1986 and 1993 British Opens.

"I'd love to see four or five guys up there, not just two. But I think the players themselves, they just go play.

"Phil is more enjoyable to watch in a lot of ways because he just goes after everything. He's also got a great short game, probably on a par (with Woods)."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in