German paper covers over Gazprom football advertising in protest against Russia
Uefa is also facing pressure to cut ties with the energy company
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.German newspaper Bild has covered over FC Schalke 04’s Gazprom sponsorship with a message reading “Freedom for Ukraine.”
The tabloid paper has vowed to “stop advertising for Putin” in its newspaper and website in protest against Russia’s offences mounting thousands of troops on Ukraine’s border and recently recognising two separatist states.
Russian energy company Gazprom owns the Nord Stream 2 pipeline which was recently paused by Germany in response to Russia’s advances into Ukraine.
Bild wrote: “When Putin invades the neighboring country and denies it any right to exist, every border is crossed! Football cannot continue to concede unmoved as long as Putin is at war.”
Gazprom has served as a Uefa sponsor since 2012 while being a key advertising partner of Bundesliga team Schalke since 2007.
Prominent FC Schalke 04 fan and marketing expert Raphael Brinkert said the deal “was, and is, and remains a mistake”.
The club said in a statement that it was watching the “latest developments in eastern Europe with great concern” but added that Gazprom Germania had been a “reliable partner” for 15 years and officials were “in constant dialogue with our main sponsor”.
“Those responsible for the club are in constant dialogue with the long-standing main sponsor,” the Gelsenkirchen-based club said, stressing that it is “without question that the club is committed to peace and peaceful coexistence.”
Bild has joined a growing number of groups calling for Uefa - Europe’s football governing body - to cut ties with Gazprom after Vladimir Putin’s decision to order troops into Ukraine.
Chris Bryant, Labour MP who sits on the Commons foreign affairs select committee, told the Financial Times that Uefa should cut ties with Gazprom.
The crisis has forced Uefa to consider moving this season’s Champions League final from St Petersburg, while raising deeper questions about Gazprom’s longstanding sponsorship of European football.
Uefa is discussing its options for moving the final, set to take place at the Gazprom Arena in May, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. The stadium hosted matches for the 2018 Fifa World Cup and Uefa’s Euro 2020 tournament.
Even before getting to the many political pressures and real-world consequences of two Uefa member countries being in conflict, there is likely to be the logistical issues of fans being banned by their countries from travelling to Russia.
Uefa now sees a contingency plan as essential, although there aren’t yet any concrete suggestions about venues. It is seen as unlikely, however, that the 2023 final could be brought forward from Istanbul, say, if two English clubs were involved.
“Uefa is constantly and closely monitoring the situation and any decision would be made in due course if necessary,” the governing body said. “Uefa has no further comments to make at present.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments