Mick Foley: Hall of Famer attacks WWE in Facebook post claiming creative team has been 'stinking for a while'
Foley believes today's WWE Superstars are vastly disadvantaged compared to the likes of Stone Cold Steve Austin and The Rock because they are not used correctly by the creative team
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WWE Hall of Famer Mick Foley has launched a stunning attack on the company’s creative team and claimed that the current generation of Superstars are being hindered due to too many restrictions on what they’re allowed to do – and more importantly what is off limits.
Foley made a name for himself in the WWE by showing a reckless abandonment for his well-being, having famously been thrown off the top of a cage during a Hell in a Cell match with the Undertaker – in which he was later chokeslammed through the roof – pedigreed face-first in a bed of thumb tacks by Triple H and losing the top of his ear in a collision with a barb-wire rope.
However, the current landscape of the WWE is very different to the one Foley experienced, with steel chair shots to the head banned and blood rarely used apart from the most extreme matches.
Foley believes that it is this restriction on the Superstars’ freedom to create matches that resonate with the crowd, plus the poor script writing from the creative team, that is behind the WWE’s dramatic fall in TV ratings.
Taking to Facebook to vent his frustrations, Foley wrote at length in a post titled “Final Raw for Foley?” ahead of tonight’s Raw show.
FINAL RAW FOR FOLEY?WWE is at a real crossroads. Allow me to paraphrase Albert Einstein, who said "the definition of...
Posted by Mick Foley on Monday, 30 November 2015
Foley said: “WWE is at a real crossroads. Allow me to paraphrase Albert Einstein, who said "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results". Wrestling historians can argue about when the #AttitudeEra in wrestling officially began. But for me, it will always be at a meeting called by Mr McMahon in the Spring of 1997, where he admitted that what had worked for them for so long in the past (I interpreted that to mean one-dimensional characters that tended to be job-related) was no longer working, and that if they were going to survive, the wrestlers themselves were going to have to step up, and help create those dimensions that would establish the emotional bond between the wrestlers and the fans - part of the lifeblood of professional wrestling.
“Today's WWE Superstars (I'm including the women here, since the term "Diva" had its time, and that time is done) are at a distinct disadvantage in some ways. They can't flip birds, and use the colourful [SIC] language. They can't bleed - even when the situation seems ripe for it. Man, Roman Reigns life would be so much easier if he could survive vicious assaults - and be left bloodied, but unbowed - the way guys in my era did. But all the blood, the language and the violence paled in comparison to the real secret weapon of the Attitude Era; FREEDOM! The freedom to CREATE..the freedom to TRY... the freedom to FAIL - the idea that going down swinging (I hope I'm not losing you guys in all the non-baseball playing countries) was almost as important as hitting the ball out of the park - as long as you took your best swings. There's a difference between playing to win, and playing not to lose: one breeds confidence, the other breeds fear. It's the difference between cutting the type of promos Stone Cold Steve Austin and Dwayne The Rock Johnson gave, and the cookie-cutter approach all too often employed these days by WWE creative. One style allowed for creativity and emotion. The other calls for memorization and recitation.
“I hope I don't sound like I'm picking on WWE. There is a big part of me that loves this company, and always will. Why else would I be up at 4:15 am, writing things that are likely to banish me deeper and deeper into the WWE doghouse? One of my favorite [SIC] wrestlers proposed a storyline that would allow me a four of five week storyline that would allow me to dig in deep, and swing for the fences - and in the process, maybe advance a few of the super-talented but underutilized athletes on the roster. I would love to do it....but I doubt it's going to happen. After all, I might want to do something crazy like go out there without a script, and try to create some real emotion - in other words, the type of thing that saved WWE in the late 90's.
“The talent pool has never been deeper. But the creative flow is stagnant...and it's been stinking for a while. I quoted Einstein to begin this thing. Let me conclude with the immortal words of Owen Heart: ‘Enough's enough: it's time for a change!’”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments