Wembley rebuild on verge of collapse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The future of the development of Wembley Stadium - the cornerstone of England's 2006 World Cup bid - is once again in serious doubt after Brent Council said it was on the verge of rejecting the plan as it does not incorporate an acceptable transport funding strategy.
A report into the Wembley planning application will be released next Tuesday, with a final decision on its acceptability due on 15 May. It is already widely known that officers have recommended that the application should be turned down because adequate funds have not been put in place to ensure the local transport network is capable of carrying the increased number of people using the complex.
A meeting between all parties last month held open the possibility that the problems could be resolved, so Brent agreed to defer the report's release to give time for financial assurances to be made.
However, Brent Council's chief officer, Paul Daisley, last night confirmed that none of the parties - including Wembley - had been in touch and unless there was any movement in the next week, the application would be doomed to failure.
"Once the report is released, it would be very difficult to go against the officers' recommendations without good reason," Daisley said. "We have a legal duty to respond to the planning application and we can't hold it up forever. At the very least we need something substantial enough to allow the final decision to be put back from 15 May. As it stands, the report is very clear and the application will be rejected."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments