Skiing: Baxter has little chance to retain medal

Nick Harris
Wednesday 06 March 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Alain Baxter, who tested positive for a prohibited substance after winning Britain's first-ever Winter Olympics skiing medal last month, may be stripped of his bronze slalom medal even if he produces a "viable reason" why methamphetamine was found in his urine sample.

"According to the Olympic movement's anti-doping code, doping is 'the presence in the athlete's body of a prohibitive substance or evidence of use'," Michele Verroken, UK sport's director of anti-doping, said yesterday.

Verroken added that a second sample from Baxter has yet to be tested, but the International Olympic Committee could proceed with a case against Baxter in the meantime. "[After the second test] we then move to on to the disciplinary stage, where charges are laid to the athlete and they have the right to offer explanations as to why that positive sample might have been the case or why they shouldn't consider it a doping offence," she added.

"Having listened to all of that, they [the IOC] still could still hand out a sanction, they could say there is a penalty but no sanction, and they could still take away the medal."

Some reports have suggested that Baxter's positive test came as a result of a nasal decongestant inhaler, which is thought to contain a derivative of methamphetamine. Baxter has not said this publicly, although it is thought he may argue this in his defence when he appears before the IOC's medical panel, in Lausanne, to defend himself. A date for that hearing is expected later this week.

Baxter has declared that he is "entirely innocent" and the 28-year-old from Aviemore has vowed to clear his name. Even if he argues that he ingested a prohibited substance unknowingly, however, there is some doubt whether he will hold on to his medal.

A precedent was set at the Sydney Olympics in 2000, when the Romanian gymnast, Andrea Raducan, tested positive for pseudoephedrine as a result of a cold cure given to her by her national team doctor. She was stripped of her all-round gold medal, but was not banned from competition.

The British Olympic Association said yesterday that the BOA will support Baxter in any way it can. "Our role now is to offer advice and support as and when Alain needs it," a spokesman said.

"Clearly we had a duty of care to him under our remit of the Games and when Alain goes to the inquiry commission in Lausanne – whenever that will be – our chef de mission Simon Clegg, who is also the BOA chief executive, will go with him."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in