Racing: Stewards turn down ban appeal by Hughes

Richard Edmondson
Friday 30 August 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kieren Fallon's efforts to record yet another jockeys' title were greatly enhanced yesterday without the Irishman having to pick up a whip in anger.

Richard Hughes, who currently trails Fallon by nine winners at the head of the championship, failed in his attempt to have a five-day riding suspension overturned at the Jockey Club. Instead there was confirmation that his performance on Dune in the Melrose Rated Stakes at York's Ebor meeting constituted irresponsible riding of a minor nature.

Hughes, however, was not angry. He was too puzzled to be angry. "I can't believe it," he said. "I'm dumbfounded. They must have seen a different view to me.

"The whole country said I'd get off – everyone on Attheraces and the professional people in racing. Richard Hannon rang me up after the race and said I'd got to appeal. Jamie Spencer said I hadn't done anything wrong. They've taken my livelihood off me for something I didn't do. I'm just a bit bewildered. It's obviously not going to help me win the title. I don't mind taking a ban when I'm wrong but when I feel I'm right it's a bit hard to take."

Hughes' explanation that he did not make a manoeuvre and that the interference was largely due to other horses was not accepted and the appeal dismissed. He was banned from 2 to 6 September inclusive and lost his £400 deposit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in