Racing: Jockeys' Association chief backs Bradley

Wednesday 15 January 2003 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Michael Caulfield, chief executive of the Jockeys' Association, has offered his unqualified support to the former jockey Graham Bradley, who had the first day of his appeal against an eight-year suspension from racing heard on Tuesday.

"I have known Graham for 14 years," Caulfield said, "and have been professionally involved in many of his cases that have been heard by the Jockey Club. Such is Graham's profile, his brushes with authority have attracted widespread attention and this sometimes presents a difficulty in distinguishing between fact and fiction.

"Even if the charge of selling privileged information is proven correct, the penalty of eight years is totally disproportionate when compared to cases where the penalties have been weeks or months, not years.

"It makes me wonder whether he has been penalised for what he is thought to have done, and whether the Panorama programme, and his association with an alleged criminal, have clouded judgements?

"Before the appeal is heard, ask yourself two questions. Would you be comfortable with writing off his new career as a bloodstock agent for eight years? And can Graham be a risk to the future integrity of racing bearing in mind all that has occurred in recent months and his desire to run a successful bloodstock agency?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in